Release procedure for the astropy core package#

This page describes the release process for the core astropy package. For the average coordinated or affiliated package, you can instead check these instructions which will be a lot simpler.

The core package has adopted the following release plan:

  • Major releases every year (or longer). These are releases that can introduce breaking API changes, and should be numbered as x.0.0 (e.g., 6.0.0).

  • Minor releases every six months in between. These releases should minimize any API changes and focus on adding new features.

  • Bugfix releases as needed between minor releases.

In terms of release procedure, there is no difference between major and minor releases - the main aspect that distinguishes these is the actual set of changes, which should contain no/little API changes in minor releases. In the rest of this document we will refer to the lifetime of a major/minor release as the feature release cycle (which lasts six months).

The lifetime of a feature release cycle of the core package is as follows:

  • Feature freeze, which consists of creating a release branch

  • Release candidates followed by a final release for the first version of the feature release

  • Bugfix releases, which can be done multiple times until the next feature release

The instructions on this page follow the lifetime of a feature release cycle chronologically.


You may need to replace upstream on this page with astropy or whatever remote name you use for the astropy core repository.

Start of a new release cycle - feature freeze and branching#

As outlined in APE2, astropy core package feature releases occur at regular intervals. The first step in a feature release cycle is to perform a feature freeze which means that we create a new release branch based on the (at the time) latest developer version, and we then subsequently no longer add any features to this release branch - only bug fixes, documentation updates, and so on. New features can then continue to be added in parallel to the main branch.

The procedure for the feature freeze is as follows:

  1. On the GitHub issue tracker, add a new milestone for the next major version and for the next bugfix version, and also create a backport-v<version>.x label which can be used to label pull requests that should be backported to the new release branch. You can then start to move any issues and pull requests that you know will not be included in the release to the next milestones.

  2. Well in advance of the feature freeze date, advertise to developers when the feature freeze will happen and encourage developers to re-milestone pull requests to the next version (not the one you are releasing now) if they will not be ready in time.

  3. Once you are ready to make the release branch, update your local main branch to the latest version from GitHub:

    $ git fetch upstream --tags --prune
    $ git checkout -B main upstream/main
  4. Create a new branch from main at the point you want the feature freeze to occur:

    $ git branch v<version>.x

    Note that you do not yet need to switch to this branch yet - the following steps should still be done on main.

  5. Update the “What’s new?” section of the documentation to include a section for the next major version (for example if you are in the process of releasing 6.0.0, you would need to create a page for the 6.1.0 release). For instance you can start by copying the latest existing one:

    $ cp docs/whatsnew/<current_version>.rst docs/whatsnew/<next_version>.rst

    Note that for these pages we leave out the trailing .0 from the version number in the filenames (e.g., 6.1.rst) since the What’s New applies in principle to the whole release cycle. You’ll then need to edit docs/whatsnew/<next_version>.rst, removing all the content but leaving the basic structure. You may also need to replace the “by the numbers” numbers with “xxx” as a reminder to update them before the next release. Then add the new version to the top of docs/whatsnew/index.rst, update the reference in docs/index.rst to point to the that version.

  6. Update the “What’s new?” section of the current version you are doing the release for, docs/whatsnew/<current_version>.rst, and remove all content, replacing it with:

    `What's New in Astropy <current_version>?

    This is because we want to make sure that links in the previous “What’s new?” pages continue to work and reference the original link they referenced at the time of writing. Note the trailing .0 in the URL, which is needed because the URL will be determined by the git tag.

  7. Commit these changes:

    $ git add docs/whatsnew/<current_version>.rst
    $ git add docs/whatsnew/<next_version>.rst
    $ git add docs/whatsnew/index.rst
    $ git add docs/index.rst
    $ git commit -m "Added <next_version> what's new page and redirect <current_version> what's new page"
  8. Tag this commit using the next major version followed by .dev. For example, if you have just branched v6.0.x, create the tag:

    $ git tag -s "v<next_version>.dev" -m "Back to development: v<next_version>"
  9. Push all of these changes up to GitHub:

    $ git push upstream v<version>.x:v<version>.x
    $ git push upstream main:main
    $ git push upstream v<next_version>.dev:v<next_version>.dev
  10. Go into the branch protection rules page in the repo settings. Add a rule for the new release branch you have just pushed out that only applies to that branch. Check the “Require status checks to pass before merging” box. Add the name of CI jobs that are required; these should be the same jobs that required on main before the branching. Click “Save changes” at the bottom when done.

  11. Update the “Actual date” column of astropy/astropy with the current date for this version’s feature freeze.

  12. Inform the Astropy developer community that the branching has occurred.

  13. Once the feature freeze has happened, you should go through the PRs labeled with backport-v<prev_version>.x to see if they must also be labeled with the new version backport label.

Releasing the first feature release candidate#

Restricting changes to the release branch#

This step is optional and could also be done at a later stage in the release process, but you may want to temporarily restrict who can push/merge pull requests to the release branch so that someone does not inadvertently push changes to the release branch while you are in the middle of following release steps. If you wish to do this, you can go to the core package repository settings, and under ‘Branches’ and ‘Branch protection rules’ you can then add a rule which restricts who can push to the branch.

Updating the What’s new and contributors#

Make sure to update the “What’s new” section with the stats on the number of issues, PRs, and contributors. Since the What’s New for the feature release is now only present in the release branch, you should switch to it to, e.g.:

$ git checkout v6.0.x

To find the statistics and contributors, use the generate_releaserst.xsh script. This requires xonsh and docopt which you can install with:

python -m pip install xonsh docopt requests

You should then run the script in the root of the astropy repository as follows:

xonsh generate_releaserst.xsh 5.3 \
                              --project-name=astropy \
                              --pretty-project-name=astropy \
                              --pat=<a GitHub personal access token>

The first argument should be the last major version (before any bug fix releases and ignoring the .0 part of the version number, while the second argument should be the .dev tag that was just after the branching of the last major version. Finally, you will need a GitHub personal access token with default permissions (no scopes selected).

The output will look similar to:

This release of astropy contains 2573 commits in 163 merged pull requests
closing 104 issues from 98 people, 50 of which are first-time contributors
to astropy.

* 2573 commits have been added since 5.3
* 104 issues have been closed since 5.3
* 163 pull requests have been merged since 5.3
* 98 people have contributed since 5.3
* 50 of which are new contributors

The people who have contributed to the code for this release are:

- Name 1 *
- Name 2 *
- Name 3

At this point, you will likely need to update the Astropy .mailmap file, which maps contributor emails to names, as there are often contributors who are not careful about using the same e-mail address for every commit, meaning that they appear multiple times in the contributor list above, sometimes with different spelling, and sometimes you may also just see their GitHub username with no full name.

The easiest way to get a full list of contributors and email addresses is to do:

git shortlog -n -s -e

Edit the .mailmap file to add entries for new email addresses for already known contributors (matched to the appropriate canonical name/email address). You can also try and investigate users with no name to see if you can determine their full name from other sources - if you do, add a new entry for them in the .mailmap file. Once you have done this, you can re-run the generate_releaserst.xsh script (you will likely need to iterate a few times). Once you are happy with the output, copy it into the ‘What’s new’ page for the current release and commit this. E.g.,

$ git add docs/whatsnew/6.0.rst
$ git commit -m "Added contributor statistics and names"

Push the release branch back to GitHub, e.g.:

$ git push upstream v6.0.x

Switch to a new branch that tracks the main branch and update the docs/credits.rst file to include any new contributors from the above step, and commit this and the .mailmap changes:

$ git checkout -b v6.0.0-mailmap-credits upstream/main
$ git add .mailmap
$ git add docs/credits.rst
$ git commit -m "Updated list of contributors and .mailmap file"

Open a pull request to merge this into main and mark it as requiring backporting to the release branch.

Ensure continuous integration and intensive tests pass#

Update .github/workflows/ci_workflows.yml so that pushes on the release branch trigger a build with Github Actions, e.g.:

    - v6.1.x
    - v6.1.x

You also need to activate builds on the release branch for ReadTheDocs. Go to RTD’s Settings and check “Activate” and “Hidden” for the new release branch.

Make sure that the continuous integration services (e.g., GitHub Actions or CircleCI) are passing for the astropy core repository branch you are going to release. Also make sure that the ReadTheDocs build is passing for the release branch.

One of the continuous integration tasks that should be run periodically is the updates to the IERS tables in astropy.utils.iers, so check that the last run from this has been successfully run and that related pull requests have been merged (and backported if needed). You can also manually trigger it using its workflow dispatch option.

You may also want to locally run the tests (with remote data on to ensure all of the tests actually run), using tox to do a thorough test in an isolated environment:

python -m pip install tox --upgrade
tox -e test-alldeps -- --remote-data=any --run-slow --run-hugemem

Additional notes#

Do not render the changelog with towncrier at this point. This should only be done just before the final release. However, it is up to the discretion of the release manager whether to open ‘practice’ pull requests to do this as part of the beta/release candidate process (but they should not be merged in) - if so the process for rendering the changelog is described in Rendering the changelog.

Tagging the first release candidate#

Assuming all the CI passes, you should now be ready to do a first release candidate! Ensure you have a GPG key pair available for when git needs to sign the tag you create for the release (see e.g., GitHub’s documentation for how to generate a key pair).

Make sure your local release branch is up-to-date with the upstream release branch, then tag the latest commit with the -s option, including an rc1 suffix, e.g.:

$ git tag -s v6.0.0rc1 -m "Tagging v6.0.0rc1"

Push up the tag to the astropy core repository, e.g.:

$ git push upstream v6.0.0rc1


It might be tempting to use the --tags argument to git push, but this should not be done, as it might push up some unintended tags.

At this point if all goes well, the wheels and sdist will be build in the release workflow and uploaded to PyPI!

In the event there are any issues with the wheel building for the tag (which shouldn’t really happen if it was passing for the release branch), you’ll have to fix whatever the problem is. Make sure you delete the tag:

git tag -d v<version>

Make any fixes by adding commits to the release branch (no need to remove previous commits) e.g. via pull requests to the release branch, backports, or direct commits on the release branch, as appropriate. Once you are ready to try and release again, create the tag, then force push the tag to GitHub to overwrite the previous one.

Once the sdist and wheels are uploaded, the first release candidate is done!

At this point create a new Wiki page under Astropy Project Wiki with the title “vX.Y RC testing” (replace “X.Y” with the release number) using the wiki of a previous RC as a template. You can now email the user and developer community advertising the release candidate and including a link to the wiki page to report any successes and failures.

Additionally, you should update the release calendar by going to astropy/astropy and updating the “Actual date” column of this version’s release candidate with the current date.

Releasing subsequent release candidates#

It is very likely that some issues will be reported with the first release candidate. Any issues should be fixed via pull requests to the main branch and marked for backporting to the release branch. The process for backporting fixes is described in Backporting fixes from main.

Once you have backported any required fixes, repeat the following steps you did for the first release candidate:

You can then proceed with tagging the second release candidate, as done in * Tagging the first release candidate and replacing rc1 with rc2.

You can potentially repeat this section for a third or even fourth release candidate if needed. Once no major issues come up with a release candidate, you are ready to proceed to the next section.

Releasing the final version of the feature release#

Rendering the changelog#

We now need to render the changelog with towncrier (21.9.0 or later). Since it is a good idea to review the changelog and fix any line wrap and other issues, we do this on a separate branch and open a pull request into the release branch to allow for easy review. First, create and switch to a new branch based off the release branch, e.g.:

$ git checkout -b v6.0.0-changelog

Next, run towncrier and confirm that the fragments can be deleted:

towncrier build --version 6.0.0

Check the CHANGES.rst file and remove any empty sections from the new changelog section.

Then add and commit those changes with:

$ git add CHANGES.rst
$ git commit -m "Finalizing changelog for v<version>"

Push to GitHub and open a pull request for merging this into the release branch, e.g. v6.0.x.


We render the changelog on the latest release branch and forward-port it rather than rendering on main and backporting, since the latter would render all news fragments into the changelog rather than only the ones intended for the e.g. v6.0.x release branch.

Checking the changelog#

Scripts are provided at astropy/astropy-tools to check for consistency between milestones, labels, the presence of pull requests in release branches, and the changelog. Follow the instructions in that repository to make sure everything is correct for the present release.

Tagging the final release#

Once the changelog pull request is merged, update your release branch to match the upstream version, then (on the release branch), tag the merge commit for the changelog changes with v<version> - as described in Tagging the first release candidate but leaving out the rc1 suffix, then push the tag to GitHub and wait for the wheels and sdist to be uploaded to PyPI.

Congratulations! You have completed the release! Now there are just a few clean-up tasks to finalize the process.

Post-Release procedures#

  1. Update Readthedocs so that it builds docs for the version you just released. You’ll find this in the “Admin” tab, in the “Edit Versions” section – click on “Activate” for the tag of the release you have just done. Also verify that the stable Readthedocs version builds correctly for the new version (it should trigger automatically once you’ve done the previous step).

  2. When releasing a patch release, also set the previous RTD version in the release history to “Hidden”. For example when releasing v6.0.2, set v6.0.1 to “Hidden”. This prevents the previous releases from cluttering the list of versions that users see in the version dropdown (the previous versions are still accessible by their URL though).

  3. If you have updated the list of contributors during the release, update the equivalent list on the Astropy web site at astropy/

  4. Cherry-pick the commit rendering the changelog and deleting the fragments and open a PR to the astropy main branch. Also make sure you cherry-pick the commit updating the .mailmap and docs/credits.rst files to the main branch in a separate PR.

  5. Turn off any branch protection you might have enabled in Restricting changes to the release branch.

  6. conda-forge has a bot that automatically opens a PR from a new PyPI (stable) release, which you need to follow up on and merge. When the conda-forge package is ready, email the Anaconda maintainers about the release(s) so they can update the versions in the default channels. Typically, you should wait to make sure conda-forge and possibly conda works before sending out the public announcement (so that users who want to try out the new version can do so with conda).

  7. Upload the release to Zenodo by creating a GitHub Release off the GitHub tag. Click on the tag in astropy/astropy and then click on “Create release from tag” on the upper right. The release title is the same as the tag. In the description, you can copy and paste a description from the previous release, as it should be a one-liner that points to CHANGES.rst. When you are ready, click “Publish release” (the green button on bottom left). A webhook to Zenodo will be activated and the release will appear under . If you encounter problems during this step, please contact the Astropy Coordination Committee.

  8. Once the release(s) are available on the default conda channels, prepare the public announcement. For a new feature release, copy the latest announcement and edit it to update the version number and links. Once it is merged, you can proceed to send out an email to the astropy-dev and Astropy mailing lists. For a bugfix release, use the previous announcement as a template. You should also coordinate with the rest of the Astropy release team and the community engagement coordinators.

  9. If this is a feature release, update the release calendar by going to astropy/astropy and updating the “Actual date” column of this version’s release with the date you performed the release (probably the date of the tag and PyPI upload).

  10. In the main branch, update the file in the astropy repo to include the newly released version, and as needed mark older versions as not supported.

Maintaining Bug Fix Releases#

Astropy releases, as recommended for most Python projects, follows a <major>.<minor>.<micro> version scheme, where the “micro” version is also known as a “bug fix” release. Bug fix releases should not change any user- visible interfaces. They should only fix bugs on the previous major/minor release and may also refactor internal APIs or include omissions from previous releases–that is, features that were documented to exist but were accidentally left out of the previous release. They may also include changes to docstrings that enhance clarity but do not describe new features (e.g., more examples, typo fixes, etc).

Bug fix releases are typically managed by maintaining one or more bug fix branches separate from the main branch (the release procedure below discusses creating these branches). Typically, whenever an issue is fixed on the Astropy main branch a decision must be made whether this is a fix that should be included in the Astropy bug fix release. Usually the answer to this question is “yes”, though there are some issues that may not apply to the bug fix branch. For example, it is not necessary to backport a fix to a new feature that did not exist when the bug fix branch was first created. New features are never merged into the bug fix branch–only bug fixes; hence the name.

In rare cases a bug fix may be made directly into the bug fix branch without going into the main branch first. This may occur if a fix is made to a feature that has been removed or rewritten in the development version and no longer has the issue being fixed. However, depending on how critical the bug is it may be worth including in a bug fix release, as some users can be slow to upgrade to new major/micro versions due to API changes.

Issues are assigned to an Astropy release by way of the Milestone feature in the GitHub issue tracker. At any given time there are at least two versions under development: The next major/minor version, and the next bug fix release, for example: v6.1.0 and v6.0.1. In this case, v6.0.1 is the next bug fix release and all issues that should include fixes in that release should be assigned that milestone. Any issues that implement new features would go into the v6.1.0 milestone–this is any work that goes in the main branch that should not be backported. For a more detailed set of guidelines on using milestones, see Using Milestones and Labels.

Before going ahead with the release, you should check that all merged pull requests milestoned for the upcoming release have been correctly backported. You can find more information on backporting fixes to release branches in Backporting fixes from main.

Once you have backported any required fixes, go through the following steps in a similar way to the initial feature release:

You can then proceed with tagging the bugfix release. Make sure your local release branch is up-to-date with the upstream release branch, then tag the latest commit with the -s option, e.g:

$ git tag -s v6.0.1 -m "Tagging v6.0.1"

Push up the tag to the astropy core repository, e.g.:

$ git push upstream v6.0.1


It might be tempting to use the --tags argument to git push, but this should not be done, as it might push up some unintended tags.

At this point if all goes well, the wheels and sdist will be build in the release workflow and uploaded to PyPI!

In the event there are any issues with the wheel building for the tag (which shouldn’t really happen if it was passing for the release branch), you’ll have to fix whatever the problem is. Make sure you delete the tag locally, e.g.:

git tag -d v6.0.1

and on GitHub:

git push upstream :refs/tags/v6.0.1

Make any fixes by adding commits to the release branch (no need to remove previous commits) e.g. via pull requests to the release branch, backports, or direct commits on the release branch, as appropriate. Once you are ready to try and release again, create the tag, then force push the tag to GitHub to overwrite the previous one.

Once the release is done, follow the Post-Release procedures.

Common procedures#

Backporting fixes from main#


The changelog script in astropy-tools (pr_consistency scripts in particular) does not know about minor releases, thus please be careful. For example, let’s say we have two branches (main and v6.0.x). Both 6.0.0 and 6.0.1 releases will come out of the same v6.0.x branch. If a PR for 6.0.1 is merged into main before 6.0.0 is released, it should not be backported into v6.0.x branch until after 6.0.0 is released, despite complaining from the aforementioned script. This situation only arises in a very narrow time frame after 6.0.0 freeze but before its release.

Most pull requests will be backported automatically by a backport bot, which opens pull requests with the backports against the release branch. Make sure that any such pull requests are merged in before starting the release process for a new bugfix release.

In some cases, some pull requests or in some cases direct commits to main will need to be backported manually. This is done using the git cherry-pick command, which applies the diff from a single commit like a patch. For the sake of example, say the current bug fix branch is ‘v6.0.x’, and that a bug was fixed in main in a commit abcd1234. In order to backport the fix, checkout the v6.0.x branch (it’s also good to make sure it’s in sync with the astropy core repository) and cherry-pick the appropriate commit:

$ git checkout v6.0.x
$ git pull upstream v6.0.x
$ git cherry-pick abcd1234

Sometimes a cherry-pick does not apply cleanly, since the bug fix branch represents a different line of development. This can be resolved like any other merge conflict: Edit the conflicted files by hand, and then run git commit and accept the default commit message. If the fix being cherry-picked has an associated changelog entry in a separate commit make sure to backport that as well.

What if the issue required more than one commit to fix? There are a few possibilities for this. The easiest is if the fix came in the form of a pull request that was merged into the main branch. Whenever GitHub merges a pull request it generates a merge commit in the main branch. This merge commit represents the full difference of all the commits in the pull request combined. What this means is that it is only necessary to cherry-pick the merge commit (this requires adding the -m 1 option to the cherry-pick command). For example, if 5678abcd is a merge commit:

$ git checkout v6.0.x
$ git pull upstream v6.0.x
$ git cherry-pick -m 1 5678abcd

In fact, because Astropy emphasizes a pull request-based workflow, this is the most common scenario for backporting bug fixes, and the one requiring the least thought. However, if you’re not dealing with backporting a fix that was not brought in as a pull request, read on.

See also

Merge commits and cherry picks for further explanation of the cherry-pick command and how it works with merge commits.

If not cherry-picking a merge commit there are still other options for dealing with multiple commits. The simplest, though potentially tedious, is to run the cherry-pick command once for each commit in the correct order. However, as of Git 1.7.2 it is possible to merge a range of commits like so:

$ git cherry-pick 1234abcd..56789def

This works fine so long as the commits you want to pick are actually congruous with each other. In most cases this will be the case, though some bug fixes will involve followup commits that need to back backported as well. Most bug fixes will have an issues associated with it in the issue tracker, so make sure to reference all commits related to that issue in the commit message. That way it’s harder for commits that need to be backported from getting lost.